Contain a lead story based upon your reading which answers the questions "Who?", "What?", "When?", "Where?" and "Why?" about the event which encompasses the following criteria:  Evidence supports the topic, provides information from primary and secondary sources, organizes information in journalistic style, addresses readers' biases.
	Include at least one (but no more than two) pictures which relate to the lead story.
	Feature an editorial which encompasses the following criteria: Structures idea arguments logically, uses specific rhetorical devices to support assertions, defends positions with evidence, addresses readers' concerns.
	Be arranged in newspaper format using Microsoft Publisher

CATEGORY  10 Points 8 Points 6 Points 3 Points Layout: Headlines & Captions All articles have headlines that capture the reader's attention and accurately describe the content. All graphics have captions that adequately describe the people and action in the graphic. All articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. All graphics have captions. Most articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. Most graphics have captions. Articles are missing lines OR many articles do not have adequate headlines OR many graphics do not have captions. Articles: Purpose 90-100% of the articles establish a clear purpose in the lead paragraph and demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic. 85-89% of the articles establish a clear purpose in the lead paragraph and demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic. 75-84% of the articles establish a clear purpose in the lead paragraph and demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic. Less than 75% of the articles establish a clear purpose in the lead paragraph and demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic. Articles: Supporting Details The details in the articles are clear, effective, and vivid 90-100% of the time. The details in the articles are clear and pertinent 80-89% of the time. The details in the articles are clear and pertinent 70-79% of the time. The details in more than 50% of the articles are neither clear nor pertinent. Graphics All graphics are in focus, are well-cropped and are clearly related to the articles they accompany. Most graphics are in focus and are clearly related to the articles they accompany. Some of the graphics are clearly related to the articles they accompany. More than 50% of the graphics are not clearly related to the articles OR no graphics were used. People Discusses 3 people dealing with Nazi’s using graphics, with accurate and descriptive info. Discusses 2  people dealing with Nazi’s using graphics, and fair descriptive info. Discusses 2 people dealing with Nazi’s using variable info. Needs work on quality and has no graphics. Poor info. with little or no descriptive data and no graphics.